Between good and bad

Making decisions is not always easy, especially when you need to decide between the good and the bad, but sympathize with the in-between because you can see the advantages and they seem to outweigh the disadvantages when the product / service is used as intended. I’m not making sense? Well, hopefully it becomes clearer in the next few lines.

I ran across userfly on the ReadWriteWeb blog. It is a new online service which allows you to record a screencast of anybody who comes to your website. That way you can study the user’s behavior while s/he is on your site. This in itself is awesome. You do not need fancy and expensive equipment anymore to do basic usability testing, but you can do it on the fly. However, as you can see in the screencast, every keystroke you make is recorded and played back. Does that ring a bell?

Although I would hate to see anybody misuse this one line of code which is all that it takes to set up userfly on a website, the potential is there. When each keystroke is recorded, it is very easy to spy out passwords. However, there is a solution to that: Use a password manager or copy and paste your password in a browser’s text field. Then only the keystroke “v” will show up, but not the entire password.


Demonstration of userfly on Vimeo.

Tumbarumba‘s problem, to which Waxy.org linked, lies somewhere else. With the Firefox plug-in Tumbarumba you can replace text on a random web page you are viewing with text from a number of short stories. That adds a bit of fun and may be very good for an April Fool’s Day joke or for a session on web credibility. However, it poses a problem because

  • you don’t know on which page the replaced text appears
  • you may not detect the replacement when you only skim the text.

For example, when you take a screenshot of a page, save or print it before reading it in it’s entirety, you may not realize that text was replaced. If you then use that text as reference and quote it with the incorrect text, then that is a problem. Maybe you stumble upon the replaced text because the inserted one is way out of context, but maybe some passages will actually fit. How will you recognize the switched text then?

Tumbarumba was created as “a frolic of intrusions—a conceptual artwork“. Your mind is challenged. However, will you change your on-screen reading habit and read everything carefully?


Tumbarumba demonstration on YouTube

ZZ are going to be top: First look at the Zotz plug-in for Zotero

Thanks to my Twitter network, I learn about interesting, funny, stunning, awesome, academic things to do, to read, to view, to reflect upon, and to wonder about.

Last night, I saw @zotero‘s latest post on a new plugin that would allow Zotero users to export library collections to the web. As I am a happy Zotero user as it facilitates the process of taking bibliographic notes, I needed to check this plug-in out with which one can upload connections to the internet.

Mike Wesch wrote a blog post on “The Digital Ethnographer’s Notebook: Diigo vs. Evernote vs. Tiddlywiki” In the comment section, Zotero was introduced to the discussion and with the just released plug-in Zotz, got points for moving into the online world.

Zotz allos users to publish collections from their Zotero library to Citeline of MIT. After a collection is uploaded to Citeline, one can change the appearance, title and what others would be allowed to see. The thus created page can be downloaded as an html file to be used on an intranet for example. Furthermore, the references can be saved as files to be imported in bibliographic manager software for further use.

That is a great start to share a (part of a) Zotero library with others. I assume that the development on Citeline will continue. There is a lot of potential because right now it is rather static beyond the basic editing options and thus there is space to grow:

  • The link to the exhibit (Citeline’s word for what Zotero calls collection) can be shared through an URL and the exhibit can be downloaded for use somewhere else. However, there is no way for me to tell Citeline whether I would like to keep the URL private or public.
  • You can only delete an entire library, but not individual entries.
  • You cannot add items to an already existing exhibit.
  • People with whom you share your Citeline exhibit cannot make comments.
  • Special characters are a slight problem. They got messed up during the upload.
  • You cannot update an entry on Citeline. This is not good esp. in light of the previous point. You would have to correct the letter to its English equivalent in Zotero and upload the entire collection again but to a new exhibit and re-do all the fine-tuning on Citeline.
  • You cannot search across of exhibits of one person.
  • Other “social networking” features could be helpful, e.g. adding people to your network to keep track of their exhibits. Saving exhibits of other people, being alerted when they created a new exhibit.

Despite this list of it-would-be-great-to-have-that features, and I can think of some more easily, I already like this plug-in because it allows me to share references with others in an easy way and let them know about some of my favorite funny YouTube videos.

Citeline

Citeline

Save the search results

A Twitter message by Will Richardson alerted me to the new feature on Google‘s result pages on Friday. Since then others, e.g. Philipp Lenssen, have reported about the new feature. On the official Google blog one can read:

Today we’re launching SearchWiki, a way for you to customize search by re-ranking, deleting, adding, and commenting on search results. With just a single click you can move the results you like to the top or add a new site. You can also write notes attached to a particular site and remove results that you don’t feel belong. These modifications will be shown to you every time you do the same search in the future. SearchWiki is available to signed-in Google users.

In order to see these additions, you need to be logged into your Google account. Of course, now one can say that Google will collect more user information as all the promotions, demotions, and comments on search results will be stored in the user account.

However, there are also positive implications for me. I will actually start saving the URLs to search results because now I can annotate them and manipulate the result pages so that I have the relevant information that I need.

Google SearchWiki

Google SearchWiki

Nothing goes unnoticed

I have always wondered how the media can produce well-researched, well-written, and well-presented information basically minutes after the death of a famous person. Now I know: The information is prepared beforehand, maybe sometimes even years in advance, and constantly updated.

Unfortunate for the not-yet-deceased if such an obituary is accidentally published as in the case of Steve Jobs, founder of Apple, Inc., on Wednesday, August 27, 2008. Although Bloomberg financial newswire realized its mistake quickly, the obituary was already seen, downloaded and blogged about at Gwaker.com where it can be read in its entirety. Even the gravestone is already finished.

Macabre? Oh yeah. That is for sure. But it shows that nothing goes unnoticed online where people and not just computers crawl the net 24/7.

Steve Jobs at Macworld 2008, photo by dfarber

Steve Jobs at Macworld 2008, photo by dfarber

Poker and ringtones

After my WordPress update half an hour ago to version 2.6.1, I checked the spam comments page to see how many spam attempts I had. Akismet caught 330 and had 132 in the queue (forgot to check the timeframe). Had I clicked on the originating links, I would be a pro in poker and other casino games by now spending day and night winning and – probably more likely – losing money, and I could have filled my iPhone with millions of silly ringtones.

To avoid any potential temptation during sleepwalking nights, I deleted these spam attack comments without shedding a single tear.